Unsurprisingly, “No money like dope money” tattoo not grounds for a dependency

A Second DCA trial court found a child at risk of harm from his father because the father had gang tattoos, even though in the same breath the court acknowledged:

[O]n the other hand, he has been actively involved in his son’s life. He has stepped up to the plate in terms of providing support for the child and, most importantly, visiting the child all the time…. [H]e is doing a good job with his son right now.

Outcome? Reversed. In re J.J.V., — So.3d —-, 2012 WL 4900821 (Fla. 2nd DCA).

One Reply to “Unsurprisingly, “No money like dope money” tattoo not grounds for a dependency”

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s