Permanent Guardianship Reversals #3 and #4

#3: Oh look, someone in C.L. v. DCF, — So.3d —- (Fla. 5th DCA 2013) didn’t…

  • set forth written findings,
  • explain why a guardianship was being chosen over an adoption,
  • order the guardian not to return the child to the parent, and
  • specify the nature and frequency of visits with the parents.

#4 In S.G. v. DCF, the Department and the GAL flat concede error.

2 Replies to “Permanent Guardianship Reversals #3 and #4”

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s