child welfare, law, and lots of graphs
Nothing to see here, but if you want to watch anyway…
Florida 3rd DCA – Judges: Shepherd, Suarez, Salter
Attorneys: Thomas Butler for Father; Hillary Kambour for GAL Program; Karla Perkins for DCF
Issues: TPR for egregious conduct against non-biological child and abandonment; disqualification of judge for comments at the shelter with no written order.
Outcome: PCA’d. M.P.F. v. Dep’t of Children & Families, 3D13-1677, 2013 WL 5932469 (Fla. 3d DCA 2013).
Court: Florida Third DCA
Judges: Lagoa, Fernandez, Schwartz
Issue: Is it fundamental error to allow a GAL to question witnesses directly in a dissolution trial?
Holding: Even though GALs must participate only through counsel by statute, it’s not fundamental error if they don’t. The husband here did not object at trial and there was no showing that the GAL’s questions affected the outcome of the trial.
Cite: Millen v. Millen, — So.3d —- (Fla. 3rd DCA 2013)
Thoughts: Next up…charge of UPL against the GAL? Judge Fernandez says “it’s a clear violation of law…a third degree felony.” Says Judge Schwartz: “This is not what a guardian ad litem is supposed to do.”