As predicted, both of these orders got reversed.
Insufficient dependency order reversed and remanded: A.F. v. DCF, — So. 3d —- (Fla. 3rd DCA 2012). Oral argument here. Dependency orders require specific findings, not just a list of witnesses.
Insufficient permanent guardianship order reversed and remanded: M.G. v. DCF, — So. 3d —- (Fla. 3rd DCA). Oral argument here. The Third agrees that a permanent guardianship order must set a minimum visitation schedule and cannot completely delegate to the permanent guardian.
Leave a Reply