robertlathamesq.org

Permanent Guardianship Reversals #3 and #4

#3: Oh look, someone in C.L. v. DCF, — So.3d —- (Fla. 5th DCA 2013) didn’t…

  • set forth written findings,
  • explain why a guardianship was being chosen over an adoption,
  • order the guardian not to return the child to the parent, and
  • specify the nature and frequency of visits with the parents.

#4 In S.G. v. DCF, the Department and the GAL flat concede error.

Comments

2 responses to “Permanent Guardianship Reversals #3 and #4”

  1. Permanent Guardianship Reversal #5 | robertlatham.wordpress.com

    […] is the fifth permanent guardianship reversal this year (see numbers 1, 2,  3 & 4). This time due to lack of specific findings regarding the parent’s compliance with the case […]

    Reply
  2. Permanent Guardianship Reversal #6 and Admission is not a proper case plan task | robertlatham.wordpress.com

    […] and GALP v. DCF, — So.3d —- (Fla. 2nd DCA) are Number Six. (see numbers 1, 2,  3 & 4, and […]

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *