Permanent Guardianship Reversals #3 and #4


#3: Oh look, someone in C.L. v. DCF, — So.3d —- (Fla. 5th DCA 2013) didn’t…

  • set forth written findings,
  • explain why a guardianship was being chosen over an adoption,
  • order the guardian not to return the child to the parent, and
  • specify the nature and frequency of visits with the parents.

#4 In S.G. v. DCF, the Department and the GAL flat concede error.


2 responses to “Permanent Guardianship Reversals #3 and #4”

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *