This is the fifth permanent guardianship reversal this year (see numbers 1, 2, 3 & 4). This time due to lack of specific findings regarding the parent’s compliance with the case plan. To the trial court’s credit, the visitation schedule was sufficiently specific. In re R.C., — So.3d —- (Fla. 2nd DCA) (August 2, 2013).
Case Law Updates
1 comment on “Permanent Guardianship Reversal #5”