This is the fifth permanent guardianship reversal this year (see numbers 1, 2, 3 & 4). This time due to lack of specific findings regarding the parent’s compliance with the case plan. To the trial court’s credit, the visitation schedule was sufficiently specific. In re R.C., — So.3d —- (Fla. 2nd DCA) (August 2, 2013).
Categories
1 reply on “Permanent Guardianship Reversal #5”
[…] T.C. v. DCF and J.C. and GALP v. DCF, — So.3d —- (Fla. 2nd DCA) are Number Six. (see numbers 1, 2, 3 & 4, and 5). […]