Permanent Guardianship Reversal #5

This is the fifth permanent guardianship reversal this year (see numbers 1, 2,  3 & 4). This time due to lack of specific findings regarding the parent’s compliance with the case plan. To the trial court’s credit, the visitation schedule was sufficiently specific. In re R.C., — So.3d —- (Fla. 2nd DCA) (August 2, 2013).


Comments

One response to “Permanent Guardianship Reversal #5”

  1. […] T.C. v. DCF and J.C. and GALP v. DCF, — So.3d —- (Fla. 2nd DCA) are Number Six. (see numbers 1, 2,  3 & 4, and 5). […]

Leave a Reply to Permanent Guardianship Reversal #6 and Admission is not a proper case plan task | robertlatham.wordpress.com Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *